Collapse of Incompatibility: Part 1

Let’s take a look at Jerry Coyne’s USA Today article entitled, “Science and religion aren’t friends.”    It is worth looking at this article as it represents the Gnu Atheists best shot at convincing the general public religion and science are incompatible.  However, because my time is limited, I will dissect the article in parts.

Let’s start with the way Coyne sets up his case:

The biggest area of religious push-back involves science. Rather than being enemies, or even competitors, the argument goes, science and religion are completely compatible friends, each devoted to finding its own species of truth while yearning for a mutually improving dialogue.

There is no need for all the extra fluff about being friends with a mutually improving dialog.  All we need to focus on is this simple claim:  science and religion are compatible.  And the Gnus deny this to be the case.  They insist that science and religion are incompatible.

Yet, we already encounter a problem.  Coyne does not bother to define what he means by “compatible.”  So he must be relying on his USA Today readers using a definition that would be commonplace. As such, let’s check the dictionary.  Five definitions are cited and the one that I think of when this debate comes up is as follows:

able to exist together with something else:

Yep, that’s how I think of it.  Two things are compatible if they can co-exist together.  They are incompatible if co-existence cannot be maintained.

The nice thing about this definition is not only does it enable communication due to its widespread usage, but it is also empirically detectable.  As such, we can easily demonstrate the compatibility of religion and science with two pictures.

Is he one of those guys who supposedly burned all those hundreds of scientists at the stake?  No, try again:

His name was Gregor Mendel.  Actually, he was born Johann Mendel, but he took the name Gregor when he began his training as a priest.

He is also the father of modern genetics.

It is a simple, undeniable, empirical fact that a modern genetics was birthed in a monastery.  And it is rather obvious to me that this fact is incompatible with the incompatibility argument.  That Gnu atheists have come up with ways to explain away this fact with rationalizations tells us that their incompatibility argument is an unfalsifiable belief.  Coyne personally believes, with great conviction, that science and religion are incompatible.  But he has no way of knowing whether he is wrong.

About these ads
This entry was posted in New Atheism, Religion, Science and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Collapse of Incompatibility: Part 1

  1. bbrown1 says:

    Aquinas famously said that theology is the “queen of the sciences”.
    The modern emperical scientific method can only explore a very small subset of all of reality. Science is subsumed by, and made sense of (ie: given meaning by, as well as scientifically undertood in proper context ) in the greater study of the big picture, which theology considers.
    The idea of any incompatability is a very recent fad amongst a small group of willfully ignorant, historically illiterate academics.

    –Bill
    Forest, VA, USA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s