Gnu atheists don’t seem to care about intellectual consistency. For example, Gnus pride themselves on their skepticism and their demands for evidence. Yet Gnu activist Jerry Coyne laps up some of his hate mail and decides to share it:
See how I am made to suffer for my belief that free will is an illusion? I am accused of being a pedophile! LOL.
Note that I have pasted this directly from the email I got; the misspellings and other errors, which are ubiquitous, are the responsibility of “Lee Hudson”
From: Lee Hudson [email address redacted]
To: [my email address]
what do you gain from this? do you get a sick turn on from telling peope there not responsible? does it arouse you saying paedophiles are blameless? your a sick fuck jerry, a dirty paedophile prommoter. do you have kids jerry? I doubt someone like you would ever become a father but if you are, its even sicker and more disgusting, I bet they are really proud of a daddy who writes brain stuff about how nobody is free or responsible. Some get a firefighter or cop daddy or a lawyer, but no they will have you. At highschool it will be like yeah my dad writes articles but how none of us are responsible and being paedophile is ok. your sick, if you have kids I hope they disown you and Im sure your parents are really proud of you also…not! a career in writing about how moral responsibility is impossible and we are all blameless, well done you disturbed indivudual!!!
p.s. There’s a new post on free will just below for those of you who are following this debate.
One of the thousands of Lee Hudson’s out there is a guy who can’t spell and does not know how to use the apostrophe in such a way that it leads to a deliciously ironic ending. Yet the same ignorant man is plugged into some relatively obscure scientist’s discussion of free will. Yeah, right.
I’d say there is a 90% chance Lee Hudson is a Gnu troll imitating how Gnus think of their opponents. And since Gnus tells us just how important evidence is, I am obligated to note there is no evidence this email is legit. I guess Gnus are not being truthful when they claim to have this commitment to evidence.
It is also interesting that Coyne writes, “the misspellings and other errors, which are ubiquitous, are the responsibility of “Lee Hudson””
They are? In the previous essay he promotes, Coyne writes:
If the public thinks they they really are really puppets on the strings of our genes and our environments (which we are),…..
Er, then Coyne should have written – the misspellings and other errors, which are ubiquitous, are the effects of “Lee Hudson’s” genes and environment.
But he didn’t, now did he? Coyne’s position is so intellectually bankrupt that he can’t even live it. He demands evidence from others, but gullibly laps up the likely work of a troll and passes it on to his lapdog audience. Then, to top it off, he wants to hold someone responsible for what they write while telling us we are all really puppets on the strings of our genes and our environments.
One has to wonder if there is truly a substantive core to Gnu atheism.