The Hate that Blinds You

Earlier I noted that Gnu atheism and intellectual consistency do not seem to mix.  For example, Gnu atheists promote themselves as a special class of people with this extreme commitment to evidence.  But again and again and again, we find them making claims without any evidence.  How is it that a group of people can so easily slip into such obvious hypocrisy?

I have a hypothesis.

Given the hateful essence of PZ Myer’s blog, it was not surprising to see him host Ed Kroc’s expression of hate against religious scientists and mathematicians. 

There are three kinds of religious scientists (and mathematicians): cowards, liars and idiots. The cowards need to be reassured and rescued, the liars need to be challenged and contested, and the idiots need to be exposed. It is because of this that I have become an engaged atheist, outspoken and loud, a “new” atheist if that’s what you want to call it. As long as the cowards, liars and idiots are protected by our silence and general disinterest in anything not directly related to our research, they will continue to compromise the credibility of our fields. You can be a brilliant scientist and still believe in god, but you can’t do it sincerely. That’s a problem. Sooner or later will be a clash, whether it’s in the form of muddling research, deceiving students or misrepresenting reality in a public statement or lecture. If you’re going to devote your life to the pursuit of truth, then you better have enough guts to stomach the implications, all of them.

While hate leads Gnus to label people like Jen McCreight as a slut, feminazi, or bitch, the same hate leads Gnus to label people like Francis Collins and Ken Miller as cowards, liars or idiots.

Kroc claims that scientists who are religious are compromising the credibility of their fields because they are religious.  There is no evidence for this.  Hate needs no evidence.

Kroc then claims that anyone who is a brilliant scientist and still believes in God is not being sincere.  There is no evidence for this.  Hate needs no evidence.

Kroc then claims it is inevitable that religious scientists will falsify their research, deceive their students, or misrepresent reality in public.  There is no evidence for this.  Hate needs no evidence.

So think about it.  The Gnus commitment to evidence is at best, an abstract intellectual promise to one’s self, or more likely(IMO), public posturing for PR purposes.  Such a position is easily steam-rolled by hate.  That is, when the hateful emotions arise, that “commitment to evidence” is powerless to prevent the Gnu from spouting off such nonsense like Kroc did.   For as any human knows, emotion is more powerful than intellect.

This leads me to predict that until the Gnu atheists can put a check on their hate, they will continue to violate the “commitment to evidence.”

BTW, when East Germany was under atheistic communist control, you were not allowed to be a member of academia if you were religious.  One has to wonder if both Kroc and Myers would agree with this policy.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Hate, New Atheism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The Hate that Blinds You

  1. Gregory says:

    Dear Dr. Mike Gene,

    My hope is that your hate for Gnus will not blind you. May a renewed positive focus result in a different Tag than ‘New Atheism’ becoming most prominent on this “ShadowtoLight” blog. So far, ‘Religion,’ ‘Christianity’ and ‘Science’ trail behind.

    As a rapper once said: “Don’t feed into it,” Mike Gene!

    Gregory

  2. Crude says:

    Thanks for keeping tabs on this sort of thing, Mike. You’d think groups like the NCSE would be condemning these antics, especially from a prominent science blogger who claims to be on their side and fighting for science and science education.

    Apparently the NCSE and company regard religious scientists who fight on their side as useful idiots at best.

  3. timberwraith says:

    Well, that quote pretty clearly demonstrates religious intolerance. The main problem I see with movement/internet atheism (certainly not all or even most atheists) is that antitheism is widely embraced by this subset of people. Antitheism is an intellectualized form of religious intolerance. Antitheism is the belief that most forms of religion, religious practice, and religious thought are dangerous and should be opposed. The ultimate goal is to rid the world of religion, or at the very least, greatly decrease the number of people who are religious and/or believe in spiritual phenomena of some kind.

    Sadly, new atheists behave like so many people who embrace variations of the world’s major religions. “Our ways and our beliefs are the only valid ways and beliefs. If you believe differently, there is something wrong with you. You are a threat and we will do what we can to ostracize you.”

    I don’t care whether it’s a Muslim, Christian, atheist, or Buddhist saying this. This is prejudice and tribalism. That’s the bottom line for me.

  4. apollyon911 says:

    It’s strange how people can have such hate for something they know does not exist…

  5. Michael says:

    timberwraith,

    Well said.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s