Lennox vs. Dawkins

Nothing new here, but if you have not seen this, it is worth your 10 minutes.  I think John Lennox makes the stronger points.  What do you think?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in atheism, God, Morality and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Lennox vs. Dawkins

  1. eveysolara says:

    I was anxious for Lennox to respond to the crux of dawkins’s argument ( the scriptures are the last place to get morality) but the moderator cut him off. He had a similar debate here
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/0/19563336

  2. Justin says:

    Dawkins merely exposes his ignorance of what the Bible is about by assuming that the Bible’s sole intention is to provide moral guidance – and nothing else.

    As such, his point fails miserably.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s