So it sure looks like Richard Dawkins is indeed a charlatan. Watch the interview below (thanks to Tamara!) to see him make his attack on Catholic parents based on nothing more than hearsay. Then, when he is challenged to back his claim with evidence, he retreats into some “intuitive” argument that “seems” right to him. He’s been making this “argument” for ten years, and that’s all he has. Pathetic.
So the man who made himself rich by convincing the public he was all about “the evidence” was lying when he claimed we all needed evidence for our beliefs. Dawkins does not support his bigoted attacks on religious people with evidence – he supports it with hearsay and “intuitive” notions.