Friendly Atheist Attacks Prayer

Hemant Mehta is a Gnu activist who tries to sell himself as the “friendly” (wink, wink) atheist. Yet, on the NYT website, the Friendly Atheist recently argued that prayer is a delusion:

I have no problem with “prayer” as an act of meditation. In fact, many atheists can tell you the benefit of silent self-reflection. The delusion occurs when you think someone else is hearing your thoughts and acting on them.

I’m not sure how the Gnu gknowes this, but of course, it’s not just a delusion – it’s a harmful delusion:

This is not harmless. There’s a very real downside to praying. It lulls believers into a false sense of accomplishment. We cannot solve our problems – much less the world’s – through prayer. We often see people with good intentions praying for victims in the wake of a tragedy, but prayer is useless without action, and those actions make the prayers irrelevant. To paraphrase the great Robert Green Ingersoll, hands that help are far better than lips that pray.

Hmmm. The Friendly Atheist does not support his claims of “a very real downside” with very real evidence. Instead, we get clichés and a quote from an old “great” atheist. Standard operating procedure for New Atheists, as they never seem to practice what they preach.

Has it ever occurred to Mehta that people who spend more time praying might be the same people who spend more time acting?

Putnam and Campbell unveiled some of their research at a recent conference in Key West, Fla., hosted by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. The scholars say their studies found that religious people are three to four times more likely to be involved in their community. They are more apt than nonreligious Americans to work on community projects, belong to voluntary associations, attend public meetings, vote in local elections, attend protest demonstrations and political rallies, and donate time and money to causes — including secular ones. At the same time, Putnam and Campbell say their data show that religious people are just “nicer”: they carry packages for people, don’t mind folks cutting ahead in line and give money to panhandlers. The scholars say the link between religion and civic activism is causal, since they observed that people who hadn’t attended church became more engaged after they did.

Oh well, I suppose evidence like that does not fit into the dark picture the “Friendly” Atheist is trying to peddle to the masses. Stick with a quote from an old, dead Gnu.

What’s more, I don’t think the Friendly Atheist understands the essence of prayer. Found this in the comments section of that NYT article:

Prayer isn’t a vain attempt to feel in control. Rather, prayer is a tacit admission that one isn’t in control.

Yep. Prayer is a time when someone actually tries to become honest with himself. Maybe one of the reasons so many atheists can become so consistently obnoxious is that they never take the time to be honest with themselves. I guess that’s the “very real downside” to not praying.

This entry was posted in atheism, New Atheism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Friendly Atheist Attacks Prayer

  1. Bilbo says:

    From the article:

    The 1950s was “probably the most religious period in American history,” according to Putnam, when 55 percent of Americans attended religious services regularly. Cultural changes — think: sex, drugs, and rock `n’ roll — led to a massive decline in religious observance in the 1960s, the scholars said. Religion — particularly evangelicalism — bounced back in the 1970s and the 1980s, but began to drop off again in the 1990s after the political ascendance of the religious right, according to Putnam and Campbell. “That so-called politicization of religion triggered great hostility toward religion,” leading to a “dramatic growth in secularism and `none’s” — sociologists’ term for people who claim no religious affiliation. As many as a quarter of young people would be in church — many say they still believe in God — but they’re turned off by how political American religion has become, according to Putnam.

  2. The Deuce says:

    He’s a live and let live kind of guy, that Friendly Atheist, not at all like the nasty atheist stereotype. He’s quite alright with you having you beliefs about God and stuff just as long as, you know, you don’t *actually* have any beliefs about God and stuff. If you actually believe in God, that’s gonna be a bit of a problem. But other than that one little thing, he’s very tolerant.

  3. eveysolara says:

    Seems to me like the emphasis is on community they find in churches. When you’re surrounded by people who love you and who will take care of you, I think you’ll be a better citizen.

  4. Cristero says:

    Friendly Atheist is an oxymoron.

  5. TFBW says:

    Now, now, Cristero: that remark is neither true nor constructive.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.