Hemant Mehta, the atheist activist/propagandist who makes money off spreading anti-Christian hate, is as it again. This time he is complaining about Franklin Graham‘s tent hospital in Central Park that was working under the charity Samaritan’s Purse.
Mehta is forced to admit:
There’s no evidence of discrimination against the patients — even the city acknowledged that.
Yet, the holier-than-thou activist demands the city should have discriminated:
But it’s disturbing that NYC partnered with Graham’s group at all, given the inherent bigotry involved.
Again, he has to admit:
Again, none of that is to say the volunteers treated the patients poorly.
Yet his sense of moral superiority and smugness is so extreme that he actually believes:
But all the good they did was outweighed by the hate they represented.
So if all that “hate they represented” outweighed the good they did, it stands to reason they should not have done any of that good. They, with all that “hate they represented,” should have just stayed away.
The logic of this position strongly suggests that Hemant Mehta believes that the 300+ people treated by Samaritan’s Purse should have remained untreated. Maybe even a few should have died. All better than NYC partnering with them, right?
Is anyone surprised that atheist activists would rather see people die of covid-19 if such death helps to support the cause of “social justice?”